Norway Paves Way For Future Warfare With Cutting-Edge Drone Swarm System
Norwegian Army Selects Valkyrie Drone Swarm from Six Robotics The Norwegian Army has selected the …
10. October 2025
Sanders Unveils Plan To Tackle Ais Crushing Blow To American Economy
The Looming Threat of AI Automation: How Bernie Sanders Seeks to Mitigate its Devastating Impact on the Economy
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being touted as the future of work, but a vocal critic of the status quo has stepped forward with a bold proposal to address the existential threat it poses to the economy. Senator Bernie Sanders (D-VT), a long-time champion of labor rights, has released a report outlining the potential consequences of AI automation on US jobs over the next decade.
The report’s most alarming projection is that nearly 100 million American jobs could be lost to AI by 2033, with devastating consequences for workers, communities, and the economy as a whole. At the heart of this crisis lies an economic issue known as the productivity-wage gap, which has been growing exponentially since the 1970s.
Since then, corporate profits have skyrocketed, with the top 1% of earners accumulating an unprecedented share of wealth. Meanwhile, real wages for the average American worker have stagnated, falling by nearly $30 per week over the past four decades. This stark contrast between productivity growth and stagnant wages has resulted in a widening gap between what workers produce and what they receive in terms of compensation.
Sanders argues that this issue is further exacerbated by the rise of AI and automation, which has the potential to accelerate the erosion of worker wages and benefits. Corporate executives have made no secret of their enthusiasm for using AI to streamline production, cut costs, and boost profits – often at the expense of workers whose jobs are vulnerable to being automated.
The senator’s proposed solution is a “robot tax” – a direct excise tax on large corporations that would redistribute the wealth created by these technologies back to the workers impacted. This concept has been gaining traction in recent years, with some arguing that it could provide a crucial safety net for those whose livelihoods are disrupted by automation.
The idea of a robot tax is closely tied to the notion of a universal basic income (UBI), which has gained significant attention in recent years as a potential solution to the growing problem of technological unemployment. The concept involves providing every citizen with a regular, unconditional sum of money from the government to cover their basic needs, regardless of their employment status.
While Sanders’ proposal is not without its critics, it is clear that he is not alone in his concerns about the impact of AI on work and the economy. Even tech mogul Bill Gates has expressed support for the idea of a robot tax, recognizing that the current system is failing workers who are being left behind by technological progress.
However, some commentators argue that a UBI alone may not be enough to address the deeper issues at play. They contend that without robust worker protections and democratic control of the workplace, a UBI could only serve as a temporary band-aid fix, exacerbating the very problems it aims to alleviate.
For example, the need for rent freezes and price controls becomes increasingly pressing if workers are not able to afford the basic necessities of life. Furthermore, the lack of democratic representation in the workplace can lead to a situation where workers are exploited and denied their fair share of the wealth created by technological advancements.
As AI continues to transform the nature of work, it is essential that policymakers and business leaders take a closer look at the social and economic implications of this trend. Sanders’ proposal offers a compelling starting point for this conversation, but it is clear that a more nuanced and multifaceted approach will be needed to ensure that the benefits of technological progress are shared by all.
One possible solution lies in the concept of “worker ownership” – where workers have a direct stake in the companies they work for. This could involve employee-owned cooperatives, worker-controlled enterprises, or even community land trusts. By giving workers more control over their own workplaces and industries, we can begin to address some of the underlying issues driving the productivity-wage gap.
Ultimately, the future of work will depend on how we choose to design our economic systems. Will we continue down the path of corporate profiteering and worker exploitation, or will we find a way to harness technological progress for the benefit of all? The answer lies in the hands of policymakers, business leaders, and workers themselves.
The fate of American work hangs in the balance. If workers are going to be replaced by robots, as will be the case in many industries, we’re going to need to adapt tax and regulatory policies to assure that the change does not simply become an excuse for race-to-the-bottom profiteering by multinational corporations.