26. February 2026
Rival Factions Emerge At Indias Ai Summit As Industry Leaders Clash Over Vision For Future

The world of artificial intelligence (AI) is often touted as a utopian future, where machines and humans collaborate to create a better world. However, recent events at India’s AI Summit in New Delhi have revealed a more nuanced reality, highlighting the deep-seated rivalries and tensions between industry leaders.
At the summit, Prime Minister Narendra Modi invited all attendees to join hands and raise them above their heads, a gesture of unity and cooperation. But two prominent figures, Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, and Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, refused to participate. This brief moment of awkwardness was captured on camera, and the image has since gone viral.
Amodei’s reaction was noteworthy, as he seemed unsure whether he was being mocked or not. The incident highlighted the complicated history between OpenAI and Anthropic, which dates back to 2021 when Amodei left OpenAI to form Anthropic with a group of former employees. The split was reportedly due to disagreements over the direction of OpenAI, with Amodei wanting to focus on safety and ethics in AI development.
However, the rivalry has escalated significantly in recent months. In January, Anthropic launched a series of Super Bowl commercials that were widely interpreted as a response to OpenAI’s decision to start displaying ads within its popular chatbot, ChatGPT. The ads were seen as a thinly veiled dig at OpenAI, and they clearly struck a nerve.
Altman responded to the criticism by releasing a lengthy rant on X (formerly Twitter), accusing Anthropic of being “deceptive” and suggesting that the company was an “authoritarian entity.” However, his words were met with skepticism, as many saw them as a desperate attempt to deflect attention from OpenAI’s own controversies.
The rivalry between OpenAI and Anthropic has significant implications for the future of AI regulation. The two companies have fundamentally different views on how to shape the industry, with OpenAI advocating for a laissez-faire approach and Anthropic pushing for stronger regulations. This divide is likely to play out in the upcoming midterm elections, where both companies are investing heavily in super PACs to influence policy decisions.
Anthropic’s decision to pour $20 million into a super PAC aimed at combating another super PAC backed by key OpenAI figures and investors is a clear example of this rivalry playing out. The money will be used to support candidates who share Anthropic’s views on AI regulation, while OpenAI-backed super PACs will focus on supporting candidates who favor a more permissive approach.
The tension between these two companies is not limited to their differing opinions on AI regulation. There are also concerns about the ethics of AI development and the need for greater transparency and accountability in the industry. Anthropic’s focus on safety and ethics has been seen as a response to OpenAI’s more aggressive pursuit of growth and profit.
In this context, the incident at the India AI Summit takes on a deeper significance. It highlights the human side of these companies and their leaders, who are often portrayed as faceless entities in the media. The awkwardness and tension between Altman and Amodei serve as a reminder that even in the world of high-tech giants, personalities and egos can play a significant role.
As the AI industry continues to grow and evolve, it is essential to recognize the complex dynamics at play. The rivalry between OpenAI and Anthropic serves as a microcosm for the broader debates about regulation, ethics, and accountability in AI development. It also underscores the need for greater transparency and cooperation among industry leaders, who must work together to ensure that AI benefits society as a whole.
The incident has sparked a wider conversation about the role of leadership in shaping the future of AI. It highlights the need for more collaborative and inclusive approaches to AI development, where diverse perspectives and values are valued and respected. By acknowledging the complexities and challenges inherent in AI development, we can work towards creating a more harmonious and accountable industry that benefits all stakeholders.
The rivalry between OpenAI and Anthropic will likely continue to shape the future of AI, but it also presents an opportunity for growth and innovation. By recognizing both the opportunities and challenges presented by this technology, we can work towards creating a brighter future for humanity, where AI is used to enhance and improve lives, rather than control them.
In the coming years, it will be essential to monitor the evolution of this rivalry and its implications for the broader AI industry. As the stakes grow higher, it is crucial that policymakers, regulators, and industry leaders come together to develop a more comprehensive and inclusive approach to AI development, one that balances growth with accountability, safety, and ethics.