Trypillian Unveils Revolutionary New Era In Military Tech
The British-Ukrainian developer Trypillian has made a significant splash in the military technology …
04. October 2025
Ice Unleashes Big Brother On Social Media Hires 30 Contractors To Analyze Online Activity
The United States immigration authorities have announced plans to significantly expand their social media surveillance capabilities, with a focus on hiring nearly 30 contractors to analyze online posts, photos, and messages for intelligence that can inform deportation raids and arrests. This initiative is part of ICE’s (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) efforts to modernize its enforcement operations and stay ahead of emerging threats.
Federal contracting records reviewed by WIRED show the agency is seeking private vendors to run a multiyear surveillance program out of two of its little-known targeting centers. The program envisions stationing nearly 30 private analysts at Immigration and Customs Enforcement facilities in Vermont and Southern California to scour Facebook, TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, and other platforms for raw material that can be transformed into intelligence.
The initiative is still at the request-for-information stage, a step agencies use to gauge interest from contractors before an official bidding process. Draft planning documents show the scope of the scheme is ambitious, with ICE seeking a contractor capable of staffing the centers around the clock and providing real-time processing capabilities. The agency aims to supply its enforcement operations with the latest and greatest subscription-based surveillance software, as well as generate fresh leads for enforcement raids.
The two facilities at the heart of this plan are two of ICE’s three targeting centers, responsible for producing leads that feed directly into the agency’s enforcement operations. The National Criminal Analysis and Targeting Center sits in Williston, Vermont, handling cases across much of the eastern United States. The Pacific Enforcement Response Center, based in Santa Ana, California, oversees the western region and is designed to run 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
Internal planning documents show that each site would be staffed with a mix of senior analysts, shift leads, and rank-and-file researchers. Vermont would see a team of around a dozen contractors, including a program manager and 10 analysts. California would host a larger, nonstop watch floor with 16 staff members. At all times, at least one senior analyst and three researchers would be on duty at the Santa Ana site.
Together, these teams would operate as intelligence arms of ICE’s Enforcement and Removal Operations division. They would receive tips and incoming cases, research individuals online, and package the results into dossiers that could be used by field offices to plan arrests, deportations, or other enforcement actions. This level of sophistication in surveillance and analysis capabilities would enable ICE to stay ahead of emerging threats and identify potential targets more effectively.
The use of social media surveillance by ICE is not a new development. In recent years, the agency has been using online monitoring tools to track individuals, communities, and organizations deemed to be at risk of immigration enforcement action. However, this latest initiative represents a significant expansion of these capabilities, with a focus on analyzing vast amounts of online data in real-time.
Critics argue that such programs can be used to target marginalized communities, stoke fear, and exacerbate existing social divisions. Others point out that the use of private contractors to analyze online data raises concerns about accountability, transparency, and the potential for bias. ICE has maintained that its social media surveillance program is aimed at identifying and disrupting threats to national security and public safety.
Despite ICE’s assurances, there are many questions about how this program would operate in practice. For example, what specific criteria would contractors use to determine whether an individual or group is considered a threat? How would the agency ensure that it was not inadvertently targeting innocent individuals or communities?
Moreover, the use of social media surveillance by ICE raises important questions about its relationship with private companies and the tech giants who host these platforms. As the agency looks to expand its online monitoring capabilities, it must navigate complex issues around data sharing, platform regulation, and the limits of corporate liability.
In recent years, there have been numerous examples of social media surveillance being used by governments around the world to target marginalized communities. In China, the government has used online monitoring tools to track dissidents, activists, and minority groups. Similarly, in Saudi Arabia, the government has been accused of using social media surveillance to suppress dissent and stifle free speech.
In the United States, there have also been reports of law enforcement agencies using social media monitoring tools to target communities deemed to be at risk of gang violence or other threats. However, these programs have often raised concerns about bias, accountability, and transparency.
The implications of ICE’s social media surveillance program extend far beyond the agency itself. They have implications for the broader tech industry, policymakers, and civil society organizations who are working to protect human rights and promote democratic values in the digital age.
Policymakers must consider the potential implications of this initiative and ensure that any surveillance programs carried out by government agencies respect human rights, uphold democratic values, and are transparent in their operations. They should also explore ways to regulate private contractors and tech companies to prevent the misuse of data and protect vulnerable populations.
The proposed program is a significant development in ICE’s efforts to modernize its enforcement operations. However, it also raises important questions about accountability, transparency, and the role of social media surveillance in law enforcement and immigration enforcement. As policymakers move forward with this initiative, they must prioritize human rights, democratic values, and the protection of marginalized communities.
In this context, it is crucial that policymakers take a closer look at the proposed program and consider its potential implications. They must ensure that any surveillance programs carried out by government agencies respect human rights, uphold democratic values, and are transparent in their operations.
The use of social media surveillance by ICE has significant implications for the broader tech industry, policymakers, and civil society organizations who are working to protect human rights and promote democratic values in the digital age. The agency’s efforts to modernize its enforcement operations through social media surveillance raise important questions about accountability, transparency, and the potential misuse of data.
As the debate surrounding ICE’s proposed program continues, it is essential that policymakers prioritize the protection of marginalized communities and the promotion of human rights. They must also explore ways to regulate private contractors and tech companies to prevent the misuse of data and protect vulnerable populations.
The implications of this initiative are far-reaching and complex, requiring careful consideration from policymakers, civil society organizations, and the broader tech industry. As the agency moves forward with its plans for a 24/7 social media surveillance team, it is crucial that they prioritize human rights, democratic values, and transparency in their operations.