Artificial Intelligence Revolutionizes Unmanned Systems To Enhance Global Security And Operations
The unmanned systems market is rapidly evolving, with emerging trends and technologies poised to …
28. June 2025
Enterprise Embracing Hybrid Ai Approach As Closed And Open Models Evolve
The Evolution of Enterprise AI Strategies: Balancing Open and Closed Models
In recent years, enterprises have faced a critical choice between open-source and closed proprietary technologies. This dichotomy has also been applied to artificial intelligence (AI), with multiple options for both types of models emerging in the market. As the AI landscape continues to evolve, understanding when to use an open or closed model is crucial for enterprise decision-makers.
The Open-Source Revolution
Open-source models have gained significant traction in recent years, with notable examples including Meta’s Llama, IBM Granite, Alibaba’s Qwen, and DeepSeek. These models are designed to be freely available, with open-source code that can be used, fine-tuned, and customized without restrictions. This has led to a vibrant developer ecosystem, with numerous organizations contributing to the development and improvement of these models.
Open-source models offer several benefits, including greater control, flexibility, and customization options. They are also supported by a large community of developers, which ensures that they remain up-to-date and secure. However, open-source models also come with their own set of challenges, such as the need for significant engineering expertise to fine-tune and maintain them.
The Closed-Proprietary Alternative
On the other hand, closed proprietary models offer a more traditional approach to AI, with companies like OpenAI and Anthropic developing highly accurate and reliable models. These models are often used in high-stakes applications, such as finance, healthcare, and law enforcement, where accuracy and reliability are paramount.
Closed proprietary models provide several benefits, including ease of use, simplified scaling, and enhanced performance. They also offer significant developer support, including documentation, hands-on advice, and tight integrations with infrastructure and applications. However, these models come at a cost, both in terms of licensing fees and the need for specialized expertise to maintain them.
Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Reality Check
When evaluating the TCO of open-source versus closed proprietary AI models, it’s essential to consider multiple factors beyond just upfront costs. While open-source models may seem like a cheaper option initially, they can require significant resources to fine-tune and maintain, especially for complex applications.
Closed proprietary models often come with higher licensing fees but offer enhanced performance and simplified scaling, which can be critical for businesses seeking growth and innovation. It’s crucial to assess the TCO based on factors such as accuracy requirements, latency needs, cost constraints, security demands, and compliance obligations to make an informed decision.
Making the Choice
Enterprises must carefully evaluate their specific needs and requirements to choose between open-source and closed proprietary AI models. According to experts, the key is to understand the trade-offs between control, flexibility, and customization options versus ease of use, simplified scaling, and enhanced performance.
For instance, if rapid prototyping or experimentation with AI models is a priority, an open-source model may be more suitable. However, in highly regulated industries like finance or healthcare, closed proprietary models may offer greater accuracy and reliability, making them a better choice.
Hybrid Approach: The Future of AI
Many enterprises are adopting a hybrid approach that combines both open-source and closed proprietary models. This allows them to leverage the benefits of each type while minimizing costs and risks. By doing so, organizations can create a strategic portfolio approach that optimizes for different use cases within their organization.
To achieve this, businesses need to audit their current AI workloads, map them against a decision framework, and assess their organizational capabilities for model fine-tuning, hosting, and maintenance. They should also experiment with model orchestration platforms that can automatically route tasks to the most appropriate model, whether open or closed.
By taking a nuanced approach to evaluating TCO and understanding the benefits and challenges of each type of model, enterprises can build a more effective AI strategy that drives growth, innovation, and success in today’s fast-paced digital landscape.