Tulsa Fire Department Unveils Cutting-Edge Drone Technology To Revolutionize Emergency Response
The Public Safety Drone Review is a monthly event that brings together public safety professionals, …
30. September 2025
Denmark Cracks Down On Drones As Eu Air Security Hits Critical Point
Denmark’s Drone Ban Highlights Urgent Need for Counter-UAS Systems That Can Tell Friend from Foe
A move that has sent shockwaves through the European Union, Denmark has imposed a temporary ban on all civilian drone flights nationwide. The decision comes after a series of unauthorized drone sightings over airports and military bases disrupted air traffic and raised security concerns. As Copenhagen prepares to host major EU and EPC summits this week, the ban is designed to eliminate confusion between malicious drone activity and legitimate civilian flights.
The sweeping restriction highlights a deeper challenge for governments and industry: the urgent need for counter-UAS technologies capable of distinguishing between “friendly” and “unfriendly” drones in real time. Drone sightings force groundings and heighten security concerns, underscoring the importance of developing effective counter-drone solutions.
Drone sightings have become increasingly common in Europe, with incidents reported across multiple countries. These events often result in significant disruptions to air traffic, particularly at major airports like Copenhagen Airport, which has seen hours-long flight suspensions due to unauthorized drone activity.
The ban follows similar reports from Aalborg and Billund airports, as well as from military facilities including Skrydstrup air base, home to Danish F-16 and F-35 fighters. Authorities have not identified the operators, but Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen has pointed to Russia as the most likely source, framing the incursions as potential hybrid attacks.
However, the Kremlin has denied involvement, leaving Denmark’s government with limited options for addressing the issue. The blunt tools used by Denmark to address the problem – a complete ban on civilian drone flights – may be effective in eliminating ambiguity for security forces but come at significant cost to legitimate operators, from commercial inspection firms to public safety agencies not explicitly exempted.
This challenge is especially acute in Europe, where Remote ID standards are still unevenly implemented, and real-time data-sharing between regulators, law enforcement, and air defense units is limited. The lack of a unified approach to counter-UAS measures underscores the urgent need for more effective solutions.
To bolster defenses, Sweden has deployed counter-UAS systems and radar units to Denmark, while Germany has sent an air-defense frigate to Copenhagen. NATO has increased surveillance over the Baltic region. Denmark’s own armed forces have mobilized “several capacities,” though officials declined to specify which systems are in use.
These rapid deployments demonstrate how seriously European allies view the threat of unauthorized drones – but also highlight the reactive nature of current measures. The need for more proactive counter-drone strategies is clear, particularly as drone capabilities advance and become increasingly sophisticated.
Effective Counter-UAS Technologies
Denmark’s blanket ban may be temporary, but the underlying issue is not. As drones become more common in both civilian and defense operations, the inability to tell friend from foe risks undermining both security and legitimate use cases. Counter-UAS technologies that integrate Remote ID, geofencing, advanced radar, and AI-driven pattern recognition could help authorities identify threats without grounding compliant operators.
Such capabilities will be vital not only for protecting high-level political events but also for safeguarding airports, power plants, and other critical infrastructure. For Europe’s drone industry and regulators alike, the lesson is clear: security solutions must evolve beyond detection technologies to include accurate identification.
Broader Concerns
The incident highlights growing concern across Europe about hybrid threats – unconventional acts that fall short of open military conflict but still disrupt national security and daily life. While some Danish officials have suggested potential links to Russian operations, no definitive evidence has been presented, and Russia has denied involvement.
For Denmark and its regional partners, the event underscores the urgent need for enhanced counter-drone technology and coordinated strategies to protect airports and other key assets. As drone capabilities advance, ensuring the security of critical infrastructure remains a pressing challenge for governments worldwide.
The incident also raises questions about the international response to drone threats. How will nations address the growing risk of hybrid attacks? What steps can be taken to enhance global cooperation on counter-drone issues?
International Cooperation and Counter-UAS Technologies
In recent years, numerous countries have begun exploring counter-drone strategies, from deploying advanced radar systems to developing AI-driven detection technologies. However, these efforts often fall short of meeting the complex demands of modern airspace.
The EU has proposed a framework for integrating Remote ID and other counter-drone technologies, but its implementation is still in its infancy. The lack of coordination between national authorities, industry stakeholders, and regulators undermines current efforts to develop effective counter-UAS systems.
To address these challenges, nations must work together to share best practices, coordinate regulatory efforts, and invest in research and development of advanced counter-drone solutions. By doing so, governments can ensure the security and legitimacy of drone operations – while safeguarding critical infrastructure from malicious threats.
In conclusion, Denmark’s drone ban serves as a stark reminder of the urgent need for counter-UAS systems that can distinguish between friend and foe. As drones become increasingly common in both civilian and defense operations, the ability to identify threats without grounding compliant operators is crucial for ensuring security and legitimacy.